Does Intruder detect Supabase RLS misconfig?

Intruder does not check database-level RLS configuration. Launch Ready Code flags disabled RLS as a P0 critical finding — the most common data-exposure risk in Supabase-backed vibe-coded apps.

What does Launch Ready Code find that Intruder misses in AI-built apps?

Disabled row-level security, client-side API key leaks, missing rate limits on auth endpoints, and platform-specific patterns from Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, and Replit. Intruder scans your perimeter; Launch Ready Code scans your product.

Is there a free way to check my app's security?

Yes. The free scan at launchreadycode.com gives you a Launch Readiness Score /100 in under 60 seconds, no credit card or code access needed.

Intruder Alternative for Vibe-Coded Apps

Q: Is Launch Ready Code an alternative to Intruder for AI-built apps?

Intruder is a continuous attack surface monitoring tool built for security teams. Launch Ready Code is built for founders who shipped on Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, or Replit. It scans your live URL, needs no code access, and returns founder-readable findings with copy-paste fixes.

Intruder is a cloud-based vulnerability scanner that monitors your external attack surface continuously. It was built for security teams running scheduled scans on infrastructure.

Launch Ready Code was built for founders who shipped on Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, or Replit and need to know if their live product is safe before users find out it isn’t.

Launch Ready Code internal data (the vibe-coded apps we've audited): an average Launch Readiness Score around 44/100 on first audit, with most apps carrying at least one P0 critical finding, missing HTTP security headers, or exposing API keys and secrets. CVE-2025-48757 affected 170+ Lovable-built apps with disabled Supabase RLS. Sources: NVD CVE-2025-48757, OWASP Top 10.

How does Intruder compare to Launch Ready Code for vibe-coded apps?

The security vulnerabilities discussed here are catalogued in the OWASP Top 10 — the industry standard for web application risk. Severity scores for individual CVEs are published by NIST’s National Vulnerability Database (NVD).

Across the 700+ vibe-coded applications Launch Ready Code has scanned, most have at least one critical security finding at their first audit, with an average Launch Readiness Score around 44/100 — LRC scan data, 2026.

Feature	Intruder	Launch Ready Code
Scans live deployed URL	✓ Yes — perimeter scan	✓ Yes — full product audit
Detects Supabase RLS disabled	✗ No	✓ Yes — P0 finding in 31/47 apps
Platform-aware (Lovable/Bolt/Cursor)	✗ No	✓ Yes — 11 AI platforms
Client-side API key detection	Partial — port/header scan	✓ Yes — live bundle inspection
OWASP Top 10	✓ Yes	✓ Yes
Missing rate limiting on auth routes	Partial	✓ Yes
EU AI Act / GDPR compliance check	✗ No	✓ Yes — Compliance Wing
Free entry point	14-day trial	✓ Free scan — no credit card
Requires code or repo access	✓ No	✓ No — URL only
Named CTO assigned	✗ No	✓ Yes — Pro and Code Care plans
Fix implementation by engineers	✗ No	✓ Yes — Code Care at $1,999 setup

What does Intruder miss in vibe-coded apps specifically?

Intruder is strong at perimeter scanning: open ports, CVEs in infrastructure, misconfigured headers. It was not built to understand how vibe-coded apps fail.

Supabase RLS disabled. The most common P0 finding in our audits. Intruder’s network scan cannot check whether row-level security is on in a Supabase project. It was present in 31 of the first 47 Supabase-backed apps we audited.
API keys in client bundles. When Lovable or Bolt builds your app, secret keys can end up compiled into the JavaScript bundle sent to every browser. Intruder scans headers, not JavaScript source. Launch Ready Code fetches and parses the actual bundle.
Missing auth on API routes. The code has an auth check. In production the middleware is misconfigured and the check never runs. This only shows up when you actually call the route.
Platform-specific patterns. Bolt.new apps often have a specific pattern for how they expose the Supabase service role key. Lovable apps have a predictable RLS misconfiguration. Intruder doesn’t know these patterns. Launch Ready Code was trained on them.

The most dangerous vibe-coded app vulnerability isn’t in the CVE database. It’s in the live database config that nobody checked.

When is Intruder still the right tool to use?

Intruder fits teams that run continuous infrastructure monitoring and need scheduled scans for compliance reports. It is especially useful when you need documented evidence of regular external scanning. Many security-conscious teams use both: Intruder monitors infrastructure; Launch Ready Code audits the product that sits on top of that infrastructure.

What does Launch Ready Code check in a security audit?

Every audit covers four dimensions: Security (OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25), Reliability, Performance, and Monitoring. Each finding is ranked P0 to P3 by severity and comes with a copy-paste fix you can drop into the AI tool that built the app.

Which Launch Ready Code plan fits your stage?

Free

Launch Readiness Score /100. Instant. No credit card. No code access.

One-time audit

$499

Full 4-dimension audit report. Ranked fix roadmap. Delivered within 48 hours.

Monitoring — Starter

$149/mo

Daily scans. Weekly digest. Catch regressions before users do.

Code Care Setup

$1,999

Human CTO implements fixes as PRs — auth hardening, RLS, secrets, monitoring.

Want to see your Launch Readiness Score in 60 seconds?

Free scan. No code access. No credit card. Just your URL.

Run the free scan

Common questions about Intruder alternatives?

Is Launch Ready Code an alternative to Intruder for vibe-coded apps?

It depends what you need. Intruder monitors your network perimeter and infrastructure. Launch Ready Code audits the live product built on that infrastructure — specifically for the patterns that vibe-coded apps fail on. Many teams use both.

Does Intruder detect Supabase row-level security misconfig?

No. Supabase RLS is a database-level configuration outside the HTTP layer. Launch Ready Code flags it as a P0 critical finding. It was present in 31 of the first 47 Lovable and Bolt apps we audited.

How fast does Launch Ready Code return results?

The free scan returns a score in under 60 seconds. The full $499 Launch Readiness Audit is delivered within 48 hours.

Do I need to connect my GitHub repo to use Launch Ready Code?

No. Every scan runs against your live URL. No repository, no code access, no install.

The Best Intruder Alternative for Vibe-Coded Apps