We run automated security audits AND compliance checks against your live URL — no code access, no install, 60 seconds. Security Wing finds every vulnerability. Compliance Wing checks GDPR, EU AI Act, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 so regulators don’t find them first.
Powered by Semgrep, Snyk, gitleaks, and Trivy. 52 compliance checks. Named CTO on Pro. No code access required.
THE PLATFORM
Most AI-built apps ship with security gaps AND compliance gaps. We close both — automatically, without touching your repo.
Security Wing
Automated 4-dimension scans — security, reliability, performance, and monitoring — against your live URL. No code access needed.
Compliance Wing
52 automated compliance checks across GDPR, EU AI Act Article 52, SOC 2 foundations, and ISO 27001 foundations. From diagnostic to CTO-implemented fixes.
AI coding tools build remarkably fast. They leave three critical gaps that most founders never see until something goes wrong.
"I don't understand all the technical details. I just need to know my app is safe, it stays online, and I won't get fined. That's what Launch Ready Code gives me — in plain English, starting free."
"Semgrep, Snyk, gitleaks, Trivy, Lighthouse — we run the same tools professional security teams use. OWASP Top 10, CWE Top 25, 52-point GDPR/EU AI Act coverage. Findings mapped to CVE IDs. No fluff."
Moltbook exposed 1.5 million tokens of user data for three days before anyone noticed. Their Supabase tables were open to any visitor with the public anon key — a pattern we find in 88% of vibe-coded apps we scan.
A checkout flow crashes at 2:14am. No error tracking. No alerts. The founder finds out from a one-star App Store review. Three days of churned users before the fix ships. The root cause: an unhandled promise rejection that AI wrote in six seconds.
In February, Quittr — 39,000 users, $1M ARR — had a critical auth bypass exposed. In the EU, a GDPR violation adds a fine on top. Apps using AI that don't disclose it face up to €35M. Most vibe-coded apps say nothing about the AI tools used to build them.
None of these founders knew. Their apps looked fine. That is what we are here for.
AI tools write code that works. They do not always write code that holds up.
The patterns we find most often: database results that return null with no check — your app crashes silently. Error handlers that swallow the exception — you never know something failed. Queries that run once on your laptop but choke under real user load. And no way to know any of this is happening until a user tells you.
Our Reliability scan catches these patterns before your users find them.
Scan for Reliability Issues — FreeNot a flaw in the tools — it's what they're designed for. They build fast. The production infrastructure every app needs is a separate discipline. One they don't cover.
We check every item on the right. We give you the fix. You paste it into Cursor or Lovable — or we do it for you with Code Care.
See what your app is missing — freeMost tools check one of these. We check all four — because a leak in any one of them is enough to end a company.
Supabase tables open to anyone with your anon key. Stripe keys leaking in your JavaScript. Broken auth that lets the wrong users in. One finding here ends the company — so we look hard.
Race conditions and missing error handling look fine in development. They appear when three users hit the same endpoint at 11pm on a Saturday and your app returns a blank page.
N+1 queries that work at 10 users collapse at 500. AI tools write correct code — not optimised code. A Product Hunt launch should be your biggest day, not your worst outage.
No error tracking. No alerts. No uptime checks. Something breaks — you find out from a support ticket three hours later. We check whether you'll know before your customers do.
No install. No repo access for the free scan. No engineer needed to understand the results.
Drop in your live app link. We analyze what's publicly reachable — headers, bundles, dependencies, configuration — with zero access to your source code.
Security, reliability, performance, and monitoring — the four dimensions checked in parallel against OWASP Top 10, CVE databases, performance benchmarks, and observability standards.
A clear 0–100 Launch Readiness Score. Every finding in plain English. Each one with an exact fix you can paste into Cursor, Lovable, or Bolt and ship in minutes.
Built on the same tools professional security teams use — Semgrep, Snyk, gitleaks, Trivy, Lighthouse — delivered in language a founder can act on without a CTO.
The same coverage a senior security engineer would do — in 60 seconds, at a fraction of the cost.
Not a wall of 200 alerts. Each finding comes with a fix written for your tool — drop it into Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, or Claude Code and ship the fix in minutes. The AI built the app. The AI can fix it — once someone tells it exactly what's wrong and how.
Score 80+ with no critical or high findings and earn a verifiable Launch Ready badge — public proof your app was tested before shipping.
Not a list of 200 alerts you'll never read. A prioritized gap analysis of every risk your AI tool left open — with a specific fix for each one, delivered in minutes.
Get the full audit today for
One-time. All four dimensions. Delivered in minutes. Costs less than one hour of a senior engineer's time.
Start with a free scoreSee your score first. Pay only if you want the full breakdown.
Security audit: $499. Continuous monitoring: $149/mo. Compliance score: $799. The three biggest threats to your company, covered for less than one hour of downtime.
Scan my app — freeFrom a 60-second risk check to a senior engineer who fixes it for you.
Also available: Starter ($149/mo) · Builder ($249/mo). Compare all tiers →
Prices in USD. Cancel anytime. 30-day cancellation notice on subscriptions. Full pricing breakdown →
Security tools check code. Compliance tools check paperwork. Monitoring tools check uptime. We check all three — built specifically for AI-generated code, in 60 seconds, in language a founder can act on.
| Ship without checking Most founders do this |
Security tools only Snyk, Veracode |
Hire an engineer | Launch Ready Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security (OWASP Top 10, CVEs) | None | Yes | Maybe | Yes — all dimensions |
| Reliability & monitoring coverage | No | No | Maybe | Yes — uptime, errors, alerts |
| GDPR / EU AI Act compliance | No | No | Not their speciality | Yes — 52 automated checks |
| Built for vibe-coded apps | No | No | Not specifically | Yes — Lovable, Bolt, Cursor +8 |
| No code access required | — | Repo access needed | Repo access needed | URL only |
| Findings in plain English | No findings | Technical alerts | Yes | Yes — with copy-paste fix |
| Starting price | $0 now, disaster later | $0–$2k/mo | $150k+/yr | Free → $499 → $149/mo |
Every week you ship without checking, all three gaps grow wider. See where you stand — free →
Sample testimonials shown for layout — replace with verified customer quotes before launch.
The vibe-coding tools got you this far on faith. The audit shouldn't. See your score for free before you spend a cent. If the full report doesn't surface anything worth fixing, we'll refund it within 30 days, no questions. The only thing you risk is finding out your app was already solid.
EU AI Act Article 52 requires every app that uses AI to disclose it clearly to users. GDPR requires proper data handling, consent, and documented policies. Most vibe-coded apps fail both. The Compliance Score runs 52 checks in under 3 minutes and tells you exactly what to fix.
$799 Compliance Score credited in full toward DFY Compliance Setup. Not legal advice — automated technical assessment.
Yes, significantly. Lovable apps frequently ship with Supabase row-level security disabled — this is how CVE-2025-48757 exposed data across 170+ apps. Bolt apps often miss rate limiting and HTTP security headers. Cursor-generated code commonly ships without error tracking or uptime monitoring. We know these platform-specific patterns and flag them directly, by name, with the fix.
AI tools optimise for generating working code, not production security. When Lovable wires up your Supabase connection, it's building a feature — it doesn't configure row-level security policies, set Content Security Policy headers, or verify that no API keys are leaking into your client bundle. That's not what it does. We check that specific gap, which is why 45% of AI-generated apps fail their first professional security review (Veracode, 2025).
Every finding comes with a copy-paste fix written for your tool. Drop it into Cursor or Lovable with one sentence: "Fix this: [paste fix]" — the AI applies it. For founders who want zero involvement in the technical side, Code Care has a senior engineer implement everything for you. You never see a terminal prompt.
Any live website, web app, SaaS, online store, or landing page — anything with a public URL, regardless of what it was built with. No code access is needed for the free score or the audit report.
No. The free score and the $499 audit report run on your live URL — public headers, bundles, dependencies, and configuration. No code access is needed for either. Scans are advisory only — we never touch your codebase without your explicit instruction.
Yes. Scans are ephemeral — we never store your source code or secrets. Nothing about your app is shared across customers, and all scan data is deleted after 30 days.
Snyk and Sentry are excellent tools built for engineering teams at funded companies with a security budget. They require code access, produce technical alerts, and are priced for organizations — not solo founders who built something on Lovable last week. We scan from your live URL, produce findings in language you can act on today, and deliver in 60 seconds with no setup.
The report is advisory — you apply changes on your own schedule and review them before shipping. On Code Care, a vetted senior engineer reviews every change before it reaches you, and we never push to production directly. You merge. You stay in control.
Anytime. Monitoring subscriptions are month-to-month with 30-day cancellation notice. The audit report is a one-time purchase. No lock-in, no gotchas.
Yes — our Compliance Wing runs 52 automated checks covering GDPR technical requirements (privacy policy, consent, data retention, cookie compliance) and EU AI Act Article 52 disclosure obligations. The $799 Compliance Score delivers an automated assessment and prioritised fix roadmap in under 3 minutes. EU AI Act enforcement is now live — the deadline has passed. The Compliance Score is not legal advice — it is an automated technical assessment. For CTO-implemented technical fixes, our DFY Compliance Setup ($2,999) addresses every finding and is the entry point to our Compliance Enterprise product.
The Security Wing covers technical vulnerabilities: exposed API keys, broken authentication, missing security headers, vulnerable dependencies, injection risks, and database access controls. These are code-level risks. The Compliance Wing covers regulatory obligations: GDPR data handling, EU AI Act AI disclosure requirements, cookie consent compliance, and privacy policy adequacy. These are legal-domain risks. Both matter — a secure app can still be non-compliant, and a compliant app can still be insecure. We recommend starting with a free scan to see your Security score, then checking your Compliance Score ($799) now — enforcement is live.
Yes. Every scan checks for the presence of error tracking, uptime monitoring, alerting on critical paths, and logging quality. The free scan will tell you if your app has no error tracking or monitoring in place. The $499 audit gives you a full Monitoring dimension score with specific gaps identified. Our Pro plan ($599/mo) includes setting up your error detection and monitoring infrastructure in Month 1 as part of the onboarding — so by the end of Month 1, you'll know about outages before your users do.
Security. Monitoring. Compliance. Get your free score in 30 seconds — we'll tell you exactly where your app is exposed, unstable, or legally at risk. No signup required.
Want a senior engineer to fix it for you? That's Code Care.